Grey Nurse Shark (west coast population) (Carcharias taurus (west coast population))
The Grey Nurse Shark is a coastal and continental-shelf shark; its west coast population occurs in Western Australian waters. It is associated with inshore rocky reefs and islands, especially nearby sandy or gravel gutters and rocky caves.
Conservation status
Commonwealth, EPBC Act 1999: Vulnerable.
Seasonal planning
Sightings and captures in Shark Bay and farther north occurred during cooler sea-temperature months.
Seasonal evidence: From published sources for this species.
Timing varies between sites and years.
- May to December: Sightings and captures in Shark Bay and farther north occurred during cooler sea-temperature months.
Identification: Appearance
Not documented in the published sources used for this profile.
Not documented in the published sources used for this profile.
Identification: Confirming identity
Confirm the identity of any suspected record with a specialist and a photograph or voucher, as required by the relevant permit.
Distribution: Known range
The west coast population is recorded from the North West Shelf south to waters near Cocklebiddy, with records extending along the coast from near the South Australia to Western Australia border to Shark Bay and farther north to Exmouth. Its distribution and movements are not fully understood.
The west coast population is recorded from the North West Shelf south to waters near Cocklebiddy, with records extending along the coast from near the South Australia to Western Australia border to Shark Bay and farther north to Exmouth. Its distribution and movements are not fully understood.
Distribution: National mapping
The Commonwealth species distribution model (SNES) maps where the species or its habitat is known, likely or may occur. Use it with local records and site inspection.
Habitat: Habitat
Grey Nurse Sharks are commonly found near the seabed around inshore rocky reefs and islands, in sandy or gravel-filled gutters and rocky caves. They are often observed at depths of 10 to 40 metres and occur across the continental shelf to about 200 metres.
Grey Nurse Sharks are commonly found near the seabed around inshore rocky reefs and islands, in sandy or gravel-filled gutters and rocky caves. They are often observed at depths of 10 to 40 metres and occur across the continental shelf to about 200 metres.
Foraging habitat: Diet
Grey Nurse Sharks feed mainly on teleost and elasmobranch fishes, as well as some cephalopods.
Grey Nurse Sharks feed mainly on teleost and elasmobranch fishes, as well as some cephalopods.
Breeding habitat: Breeding
Not documented in the published sources used for this profile.
Not documented in the published sources used for this profile.
Sheltering habitat: Shelter
Not documented in the published sources used for this profile.
Not documented in the published sources used for this profile.
Threats: Threats
Fishing can affect the west coast population through incidental impacts and bycatch.
Fishing can affect the west coast population through incidental impacts and bycatch.
Survey methodology: 1. Species-specific methods
Use methods consistent with the Commonwealth survey guidelines and engage a specialist with the right permits.
Fishery bycatch records and diver sightings have been used to document the population’s distribution. A five-year study near Exmouth documented a small aggregation.
Survey methodology: 2. Commonwealth guidance
For EPBC Act referrals, survey effort and methods should be consistent with the survey guidelines for Australia's threatened fish, read with the Significant impact guidelines 1.1.
Survey methodology: 3. Limits
A non-detection is not proof of absence. Match survey timing to the species and season, and record effort.
Vegetation associations
Source-checked associations and automatically indexed candidates are separated below. An association does not establish site presence, preference or dependence.
No species-specific vegetation association has been indexed or source-checked in this evidence library. This is an evidence gap, not evidence of no association.
Ecosystem associations
Source-checked associations and automatically indexed candidates are separated below. An association does not establish site presence, preference or dependence.
No species-specific ecosystem association has been indexed or source-checked in this evidence library. This is an evidence gap, not evidence of no association.
Soil and substrate associations
Source-checked associations and automatically indexed candidates are separated below. An association does not establish site presence, preference or dependence.
No species-specific soil association has been indexed or source-checked in this evidence library. This is an evidence gap, not evidence of no association.
Water and wetland associations
Source-checked associations and automatically indexed candidates are separated below. An association does not establish site presence, preference or dependence.
No species-specific water association has been indexed or source-checked in this evidence library. This is an evidence gap, not evidence of no association.
Fauna records and mapped habitat: Not yet analysed
Record locations can be overlaid with mapping, but record frequency alone does not measure habitat preference. No species is excluded from desktop assessments by this analysis.
No quality-controlled record-to-map analysis has been completed for this species. The existing generalised distribution dots and indicative range polygons have not been treated as precise occurrence coordinates.
A defensible run needs dated, independently attributable records, coordinate uncertainty, duplicate and captive-record checks, layer versions and regional scope. Preference and absence require additional survey-effort and detection evidence.
Habitat limitations and contrary evidence: No supported exclusion recorded
Not recorded is not the same as cannot occur. Low suitability, resident habitat, breeding habitat and occasional movement are different conclusions.
This library has not established a vegetation, ecosystem or soil-type exclusion for this species. This does not mean all habitat is suitable; the evidence needed to justify an exclusion has not been assembled.
Habitat limitations and contrary evidence: Before using a negative association
- Confirm the taxon, geographic region, life stage and habitat function covered by the evidence.
- Check survey methods, season, repeated effort and detectability before interpreting non-detection.
- Investigate credible contradictory records and microhabitats absent from broad mapping.
- Do not convert a missing map class, low record count or failed data request into species absence.
Before disturbance: 1. Desktop and approvals
Confirm whether the project could affect the species before works begin.
Check national mapping, state records and recent surveys for the site. An action likely to have a significant impact on this nationally listed species needs EPBC Act referral, and state permits apply where it is state listed.
Before disturbance: 2. Plan to avoid
Plan in-water works, vessel movements and lighting to avoid known habitat and sensitive periods, and set observer and shutdown procedures before works start.
During disturbance: 1. Controls
Keep works inside the approved footprint and conditions.
Use spotters and exclusion zones for in-water works and vessels, and pause works if the species is seen within the zone.
During disturbance: 2. Stop and report
If the species is found unexpectedly, stop work at that spot and contact the project ecologist and the relevant agency.
After disturbance: 1. Records
Record outcomes.
Record sightings, habitat lost or retained and any injury or death, and report them under the approval conditions.
Rehabilitation: 1. Restore
Restore disturbed habitat where possible.
Remove temporary structures, restore natural flow and substrate, and monitor water quality until it returns to baseline.
Sources
- EPBC Act species profile (SPRAT): Carcharias taurus (west coast population), Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water: https://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxon_id=68752
- Species of National Environmental Significance, public grids (August 2026 extract), Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water: https://fed.dcceew.gov.au/datasets/9d313bb078b9421ebebc835b3a69c470/about
- [PDF] Australian Threatened Species: Grey Nurse Shark, agriculture.gov.au: https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/grey-nurse-shark.pdf
- [PDF] Threatened Species Assessment Carcharias taurus, bio-prd-naturekit-public-data.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com: https://bio-prd-naturekit-public-data.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/species_assessments/Carcharias_taurus_14301.pdf
- Grey Nurse Shark, Carcharias taurus - Fish, fish.gov.au: https://fish.gov.au/docs/SharkReport/2023_FRDC_Carcharias_taurus_%20final.pdf
- Marine bioregional plan for the South-west Marine Region, dcceew.gov.au: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/env/pages/a73fb726-8572-4d64-9e33-1d320dd6109c/files/south-west-marine-plan.doc
- Population distribution, aggregation sites and seasonal ..., int-res.com: https://www.int-res.com/articles/esr2023/50/n050p107.pdf
- species group report card - sharks and sawfishes- Supporting the marine bioregional plan for the North-west Marine Region, dcceew.gov.au: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/env/pages/1670366b-988b-4201-94a1-1f29175a4d65/files/north-west-report-card-sharks-sawfishes.pdf
- Species group report card - sharks - Supporting the marine ..., dcceew.gov.au: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/env/pages/a73fb726-8572-4d64-9e33-1d320dd6109c/files/south-west-report-card-sharks.doc
- 2014, dcceew.gov.au: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/recovery-plan-grey-nurse-shark-carcharias-taurus.pdf
- Survey guidelines for Australia's threatened fish, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/epbc/publications/survey-guidelines-australias-threatened-fish
- Atlas of Living Australia: scatterplot case study and survey-effort limitations, Habitat evidence reference: https://support.ala.org.au/support/solutions/articles/6000208426-scatterplot-case-study