Christmas Island Flying-fox (Pteropus natalis)
The Christmas Island flying-fox is a medium-sized fruit bat endemic to Christmas Island, Australia. It lives in rainforest and roosts in rainforest trees, so retaining rainforest and its feeding habitat is relevant to works.
Conservation status
Commonwealth, EPBC Act 1999: Critically endangered.
Seasonal planning
On Christmas Island, births are reported mainly from December to March, with another study estimating January to April and a peak in February and March.
Seasonal evidence: From published sources for this species.
Timing varies between sites and years.
- Parturition season: On Christmas Island, births are reported mainly from December to March, with another study estimating January to April and a peak in February and March.
Identification: Appearance
This is a medium-sized flying-fox, weighing up to 550 g.
This is a medium-sized flying-fox, weighing up to 550 g.
Identification: Confirming identity
Confirm the identity of any suspected record with a specialist and a photograph or voucher, as required by the relevant permit.
Distribution: Known range
The species occurs only on Christmas Island, an Australian territory in the Indian Ocean.
The species occurs only on Christmas Island, an Australian territory in the Indian Ocean.
Distribution: National mapping
The Commonwealth species distribution model (SNES) maps where the species or its habitat is known, likely or may occur. Use it with local records and site inspection.
Habitat: Habitat
Christmas Island flying-foxes live in rainforest and roost in rainforest trees, including in communal camps.
Christmas Island flying-foxes live in rainforest and roost in rainforest trees, including in communal camps.
Foraging habitat: Diet
It feeds on a wide variety of fruit and nectar, including fruit and blossom from rainforest trees and coconut palms.
It feeds on a wide variety of fruit and nectar, including fruit and blossom from rainforest trees and coconut palms.
Breeding habitat: Breeding
Not documented in the published sources used for this profile.
Not documented in the published sources used for this profile.
Sheltering habitat: Shelter
The species roosts communally in trees, with camps of up to several hundred reported. Roost trees include rainforest species, and roosts may be positioned in exposed canopies to assist take-off.
The species roosts communally in trees, with camps of up to several hundred reported. Roost trees include rainforest species, and roosts may be positioned in exposed canopies to assist take-off.
Threats: Threats
Habitat loss associated with mining and other development has affected the species. Hunting and predation are also reported as contributors to its decline.
Habitat loss associated with mining and other development has affected the species. Hunting and predation are also reported as contributors to its decline.
Threats: Works risk
Land clearing and development that remove rainforest habitat or fruiting trees could reduce habitat and food resources for the species. Habitat loss associated with mining and other development has been reported on Christmas Island.
Survey methodology: 1. Species-specific methods
Use methods consistent with the Commonwealth survey guidelines and engage a specialist with the right permits.
Surveys have used active aural and visual detection of foraging individuals, with repeated visits to sites across the island. Netting has also been conducted at foraging and roost sites.
Survey methodology: 2. Commonwealth guidance
For EPBC Act referrals, survey effort and methods should be consistent with the survey guidelines for Australia's threatened bats, read with the Significant impact guidelines 1.1.
Survey methodology: 3. Limits
A non-detection is not proof of absence. Match survey timing to the species and season, and record effort.
Vegetation associations: Rainforest or vine thicket
Source-checked associations and automatically indexed candidates are separated below. An association does not establish site presence, preference or dependence.
Christmas Island flying-foxes live in rainforest and roost in rainforest trees, including in communal camps.
Automatically indexed from existing profile text. Not a verified preference, mapped occurrence or habitat requirement. Check the original source and regional qualifiers before use.
Evidence: Unreviewed profile-derived candidate
Confidence: Not independently verified
Region: Scope as described in the quoted profile text; not independently verified. Profile states: not specified.
Habitat use: general
Ecosystem associations
Source-checked associations and automatically indexed candidates are separated below. An association does not establish site presence, preference or dependence.
No species-specific ecosystem association has been indexed or source-checked in this evidence library. This is an evidence gap, not evidence of no association.
Soil and substrate associations
Source-checked associations and automatically indexed candidates are separated below. An association does not establish site presence, preference or dependence.
No species-specific soil association has been indexed or source-checked in this evidence library. This is an evidence gap, not evidence of no association.
Water and wetland associations
Source-checked associations and automatically indexed candidates are separated below. An association does not establish site presence, preference or dependence.
No species-specific water association has been indexed or source-checked in this evidence library. This is an evidence gap, not evidence of no association.
Fauna records and mapped habitat: Not yet analysed
Record locations can be overlaid with mapping, but record frequency alone does not measure habitat preference. No species is excluded from desktop assessments by this analysis.
No quality-controlled record-to-map analysis has been completed for this species. The existing generalised distribution dots and indicative range polygons have not been treated as precise occurrence coordinates.
A defensible run needs dated, independently attributable records, coordinate uncertainty, duplicate and captive-record checks, layer versions and regional scope. Preference and absence require additional survey-effort and detection evidence.
Habitat limitations and contrary evidence: No supported exclusion recorded
Not recorded is not the same as cannot occur. Low suitability, resident habitat, breeding habitat and occasional movement are different conclusions.
This library has not established a vegetation, ecosystem or soil-type exclusion for this species. This does not mean all habitat is suitable; the evidence needed to justify an exclusion has not been assembled.
Habitat limitations and contrary evidence: Before using a negative association
- Confirm the taxon, geographic region, life stage and habitat function covered by the evidence.
- Check survey methods, season, repeated effort and detectability before interpreting non-detection.
- Investigate credible contradictory records and microhabitats absent from broad mapping.
- Do not convert a missing map class, low record count or failed data request into species absence.
Before disturbance: 1. Desktop and approvals
Confirm whether the project could affect the species before works begin.
Check national mapping, state records and recent surveys for the site. An action likely to have a significant impact on this nationally listed species needs EPBC Act referral, and state permits apply where it is state listed.
Before disturbance: 2. Plan to avoid
Design the footprint, timing and access to avoid known or likely habitat, and brief crews on what to look for and who to call.
During disturbance: 1. Controls
Keep works inside the approved footprint and conditions.
Fence or mark habitat to be retained and keep machinery, stockpiles and spoil out of it.
During disturbance: 2. Stop and report
If the species is found unexpectedly, stop work at that spot and contact the project ecologist and the relevant agency.
After disturbance: 1. Records
Record outcomes.
Record sightings, habitat lost or retained and any injury or death, and report them under the approval conditions.
Rehabilitation: 1. Restore
Restore disturbed habitat where possible.
Reinstate disturbed ground with local species, return logs, rocks and litter, and control weeds and erosion until the site is stable.
Sources
- EPBC Act species profile (SPRAT): Pteropus natalis, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water: https://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxon_id=87611
- Species of National Environmental Significance, public grids (August 2026 extract), Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water: https://fed.dcceew.gov.au/datasets/9d313bb078b9421ebebc835b3a69c470/about
- Slow growth and delayed maturation in a Critically ..., academic.oup.com: https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/99/6/1510/5105790
- Christmas Island Flying-fox - The Australian Museum, australian.museum: https://australian.museum/learn/animals/bats/christmas-island-flying-fox/
- Christmas Island Flying Fox | Parks Australia, christmasislandnationalpark.gov.au: https://christmasislandnationalpark.gov.au/discover/nature/animals/ci-flying-fox/
- Pteropus natalis , Christmas Island Flying-fox, Christmas Island Fruit-bat, environment.gov.au: http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxon_id=87611
- Christmas Island flying fox - Wikipedia, en.wikipedia.org: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_Island_flying_fox
- Christmas Island flying fox, dcceew.gov.au: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/threatened/species/20-mammals-by-2020/christmas-island-flying-fox
- The Christmas Island flying fox is a rare sun-seeker, australiangeographic.com.au: https://www.australiangeographic.com.au/blogs/creatura-with-bec-crew/2020/08/the-christmas-island-flying-fox-is-a-rare-sun-seeker/
- Factors affecting the detection probability of a critically endangered flying-fox: consequences for monitoring and conservation, publish.csiro.au: https://www.publish.csiro.au/wr/pdf/WR24030
- Survey guidelines for Australia's threatened bats, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/epbc/publications/survey-guidelines-australias-threatened-bats
- Husbandry Manual: Christmas Island flying-fox (Pteropus ..., arwh.org: https://arwh.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/CIFF-Husbandry-Manual-V5-FINAL-submitted-27072016.pdf
- Atlas of Living Australia: scatterplot case study and survey-effort limitations, Habitat evidence reference: https://support.ala.org.au/support/solutions/articles/6000208426-scatterplot-case-study